
Chomp is a two-player mathematical strategy game played on a chocolate-bar grid with one poisoned corner square. Each turn you bite a square and everything below and to its right; whoever is left holding only the poison loses. Invented by David Gale in 1974, a game takes just a few minutes.
Reviewed & updated
Chomp was invented by mathematician David Gale in 1974 and reached the world through Martin Gardner’s legendary Mathematical Games column in Scientific American. The setup is disarming, a chocolate bar with one poisoned corner, but the game encodes a deep result: by the strategy-stealing argument, the first player always possesses a winning strategy on any bar larger than a single square, yet no general rule for finding it is known.
The game is a dressed-up version of a 1952 number-theory game by Fred Schuh played with divisors, and it remains a staple of combinatorial game theory courses: easy to state, fully solvable by computer on small boards, and stubbornly unsolved in general, with research papers still probing three-dimensional and infinite bars today.
Chomp is a two-minute duel of permanent decisions: every bite removes a rectangle of chocolate forever, and the whole game funnels toward one poisoned square.
Chomp scales in every direction: different bar sizes change the solved lines but not the theory, three-dimensional Chomp bites boxes out of chocolate bricks, and infinite ordinal Chomp is a genuine research topic. Its ancestor, Schuh’s divisor game, plays the identical structure with the divisors of a number, where the number 1 is the poison.
Play Chomp on Arcadia to think in staircases, feed the Glutton his poison, and win a game mathematics says is always yours to win.
Because of its existence proof: the strategy-stealing argument shows the first player can always win, but constructs no strategy. It is the standard example of a non-constructive proof in game theory.
Suppose the second player had a winning reply to the smallest possible bite (the bottom-right corner). Then the first player could reach the position after that reply directly with their first bite, stealing the win. So no such second-player strategy can exist.
Small boards, yes: computers can solve any specific bar (Arcadia’s AI has the 4x7 bar fully solved). A general formula for the winning first bite on arbitrary bars remains unknown.
While other chocolate remains the game refuses the bite. When the poison is the last square on your turn, you must eat it, and the game is lost.
Yes. Arcadia offers free Chomp in your browser with a casual AI and a perfectly solved Glutton mode — no download or account required.
You win by always handing your opponent a losing shape. The reliable ones to learn first: the 2×2 block, an L with two equal arms meeting at the poison, and a two-row bar whose top row is exactly one square longer than the bottom. Steer every exchange towards giving one of those away.
On a square bar it is known: bite the square diagonally adjacent to the poison, leaving an L with two equal arms, then mirror every enemy bite in the other arm. On general rectangles no formula is known — computers can solve any specific bar, but mathematics has no rule that covers them all.
Entirely skill. There is no chance element, and on any bar larger than a single square the first player provably has a winning strategy. In practice the winner is whoever knows more losing shapes and counts the staircase more carefully — one careless bite is usually fatal.
Because of the bite geometry: every bite removes a rectangle extending down and to the right of the square you choose. From a full 4×7 bar no single bite can strip away everything except the poison — the closest greedy bites leave a thin row or column, which is an easy win for the other side.
The game was introduced by mathematician David Gale, whose 1974 paper described it as “a curious Nim-type game”. The chocolate-bar framing and the name Chomp were popularised through Martin Gardner’s Mathematical Games column in Scientific American, and the name stuck.
Closely — both are impartial games covered by the same Sprague-Grundy theory, and Gale explicitly presented Chomp as a Nim-type game. The crucial difference is that Nim has a complete, playable formula (the nim-sum), while Chomp has an existence proof of a first-player win with no general recipe. Chomp is also identical in structure to Fred Schuh’s 1952 game of divisors.
One to three minutes is typical: Arcadia’s 4×7 bar holds 28 squares, so a game can never exceed 27 bites and most end far sooner. You can play free in your browser, against a casual Sweet Tooth opponent or a Glutton AI that has the whole bar solved.
Yes. Any rectangle works, three-dimensional Chomp bites boxes out of a chocolate brick, and mathematicians study transfinite Chomp on infinite ordinal-indexed bars as genuine research. The strategy-stealing argument guarantees a first-player win on every finite bar, but each new size has to be solved from scratch.
MAIN MENU
PvP Games
Battleship
Crazy Eights
Dots & Boxes Blitz
Gomoku
Ludo
Snakes & Ladders
YahtzeeFree Games
Alquerque
Backgammon
Bagh-Chal
Balut
Battle for Tokyo
Battleship
Bingo
Bridge
Bunco
Checkers
Chess
Chomp
Crazy Eights
Cribbage
Dara
Derby Dash
Dominoes
Dots & Boxes Blitz
Durak
Fanorona
Farkle
Fox and Hounds
Generala
Go / Weiqi
Gomoku
Hazard
Hex
Higher or Lower
Hnefatafl
Hounds and Jackals
Indian Rummy
Ludus Latrunculorum
Liar's Dice
Ludo
Mahjong Solitaire
Mancala
Nim
Nine Men's Morris
Onitama
Patolli
Peg Solitaire
Pentago
Pente
Pig
Pylos
Quoridor
Reversi
Royal Game of Ur
Scratch Cards
Seega
Senet
Ship, Captain, Crew
Shut the Box
Snake
Snakes & Ladders
Space Blaster
Spades
Sugar Pop
Tile Rummy
Tower
Truco
War
Word Spy
XII Scripta
YahtzeeNEED HELP?